Supporting The Respect Party For The UK General Election 2010 - The Only Truly Patriotic Party For The U.K.

Longest-Serving ‘Chained Wife’ Finally Breaks Free After 48 Years

Category : Islam, Judaism

Zionists go out of their way to defame Muslim men claiming we mistreat our women. But look ak how Jewish law treats their women.

Islam gives women a higher status than ANY other religions or ways of life in the entire world. But you won’t see that in the news. The reason is, if you see the truth about Islamic treatment of women, more women would probably join up in droves.

Don’t believe me? You can just as easily go and find out for yourselves. And I don’t mean from the Western media.

(Note: “Britain’s network of beth dins (Jewish courts)” – Why is this okay, and the zionists themselves oppose Islamic courts in this country? They claim Israel is their home, want to practice their religion here, but they want to prevent us from practising ours. And it’s not just the zionists who are doing this: The seikhs and hindus are the same.  They’re all hypocrits.)

Read this report from today’s Independent newspaper:

Susan Zinkin divorced her husband in 1962, but only now is she able to marry again

By Jerome Taylor

Friday, 19 February 2010

Susan Zinkin at her home in Kafar Sava, Israel, with photos of her family

Susan Zinkin divorced her husband in 1962 but was forbidden from looking for new love for almost 50 years. Only when he died an old man this week was she released from being a “chained wife” under Jewish law.

Ms Zinkin, 73, a retired Orthodox Jewish teacher from north London, divorced Israel Errol Elias in Britain’s civil courts 48 years ago but she was never able to obtain a Jewish divorce (known as a “get”) from him. And yesterday she spoke of her relief at finally being freed from her status as the world’s longest-serving “chained wife”.

“As awful as it may sound my ex-husband’s death is a great relief and a huge weight off my shoulders – to be stuck like that was so cruel,” she said yesterday in an interview with The Independent. “I’m quite convinced that had the rabbis wanted to get their act together they could have done something within Jewish law and found a solution.”

She had made repeated attempts to get her former husband to grant her a Jewish divorce, which would have allowed her to remarry. She, and many others, even resorted to regular protests outside his house in Golders Green, north London, in a bid to publicly shame him into granting her a religiously sanctioned separation, but the protests only seemed to strengthen his resolve.

But despite widespread public outcry, her “agunah” (literally “chained”) status remained in force until earlier this week when Mr Elias, 86, died.

Speaking from her home in Kfar Saba, near Tel Aviv, Ms Zinkin called on Britain’s network of beth dins (Jewish courts) to do more to help chained women and to speak out against husbands who refuse to grant divorces. “The Jewish religious authorities come together to talk about and solve all sorts of religious and social problems but they never seem to get around to discussing [agunahs],” she said. “It is time they did.”

Under halakha (Jewish law) only men have the power to grant a get. Women who cannot persuade their husbands to free them from marriage become known as “agunahs” or chained wives. Although they are legally divorced under British law, chained wives (particularly those within Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities) often find themselves ostracised if they dare to remarry or speak out.

Ms Zinkin, who describes herself as “mainstream Orthodox”, said she felt unable to find a new husband because, without a get from her first partner, any new marriage would be considered unlawful by the wider community. Her children – and any of her future offspring – would also be shunned as mamzers, a halakhic term to describe the offspring of adulterous or incestuous relationships. “That’s a terrible stigma for the child,” she explained. “They’re illegitimate for Jewish purposes and I just couldn’t do that to any child of mine. Even Jews who aren’t very religious wouldn’t necessarily want to marry someone and have children born with mamzer status.”

Attempts by rabbinical authorities to tackle recalcitrant husbands has been met with varying degrees of success. Rabbis from the Liberal and Reform schools of Judaism will often issue gets to women if a husband refuses three times, but the more orthodox branches are notoriously reluctant to intervene, believing that any sort of coercion would invalidate the get.

In the United States, some Orthodox rabbis have encouraged the use of pre-nuptial agreements which financially penalise a stubborn husband. Jewish courts in Israel have even gone as far as placing intractable husbands in prison until they grant a get. But campaigners say the Orthodox beth din courts in Britain have been much slower to look for solutions.

“It’s a very frustrating process,” says Sandra Blackman, a co-founder of the Agunot Campaign who regularly used to protest outside Mr Elias’s house alongside Ms Zinkin. “We need the Orthodox beth dins to be courageous and recognise the appalling injustices that are being carried out by some husbands. Other countries have found solutions but people seem afraid to implement them here.”

One academic hoping to find a way out of the impasse is Professor Bernard Jackson, an expert in Jewish law who until last year was head of the Agunah Research Unit at the University of Manchester. Last summer he published proposals which offered courts viable alternatives that still conformed to Jewish law, including the promotion of pre-nuptials, provisional gets that would be issued in advance of marriage, and the retrospective annulment of a marriage by a rabbi. The response from the Orthodox community has been limited.

“I can only say that meetings have been initiated, and there clearly is some willingness to look at our work and discuss it with us,” he said. “The problem is that batei din are generally reluctant to go out on a limb alone, for fear of appearing ‘divisive’. They are looking either for a consensus or for a lead from the greatest rabbinic scholars of the generation.”

Hopes for such a lead were dashed in 2006 when an international conference to discuss agunahs was called off by Israel’s chief rabbi, Shlomo Amar, just five days before it was due to begin. It was widely reported in Israel that pressure from the Ultra-Orthodox community led to the cancellation.

“I’m convinced there is a way,” said Ms Zinkin. “We need to get all the rabbis together to reach some sort of consensus on how to solve this problem within Jewish law.”

Until rabbis take a stand, there is little that chained women can do, other than resort to public protests in a bid to shame their former husbands. “I just hit a brick wall and there didn’t seem to be anything I could do,” she recalled. “I knew I just had to carry on with my life and try to forget about it.”

Few women dare to speak out about their agunah status for fear of reducing their chances of ever obtaining a get, or because they are worried about how the community might react to such public criticism. Ms Zinkin did speak out. By the end of the 1990s she was approached by a small group of Jewish women who, like her, had either been or still were chained women. The first the mainstream press in Britain heard about agunahs was when a devoted band of Jewish women bewildered north London motorists with regular protests outside Mr Elias’s home in Golders Green, calling on him to free his wife. Week after week they met outside his home but Mr Elias dug his heels in. The public coverage of the protests did, however, spur the rabbinical authorities into trying to persuade Mr Elias.

“Prior to [those protests] the Jewish authorities hadn’t even been prepared to make a phonecall or approach him in any way,” she said. “Whenever I approached Jewish judges they just said they couldn’t do anything. So the protests might not have worked in my case, but they did with others.”

The demonstrations also thrust the issue firmly into the wider public’s consciousness: “People just didn’t realise that this sort of thing can drag on for so many years. When I told people what had happened they were absolutely stunned that you can be an agunah in Britain for more than 40 years. I just hope I’m the last of a long line of agunahs.”

For the meantime, Ms Zinkin is happy just to reflect on the fact that – for the first time in nearly five decades – she is officially free. “I suppose it is a bit of a record but it’s not exactly one I’m proud to hold,” she said. “I’m just glad it’s finally over. I feel a great sense of relief, but also sadness because it was all so unnecessary. I just hope that other men will think twice about the enormous distress they can cause by not granting their wife a get.”

Fromm>> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/longestserving-chained-wife-finally-breaks-free-after-48-years-1904136.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Hamza Yusuf (Islam & The West)

Category : Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Zionism

PART ONE





PART TWO





A riveting speech by Sheikh Hamza Yusuf on the failings of those who purport to fight in the name of Islam, and the Western so-called democracies who abuse their own powers to fight Muslims. Especially the USA.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Human Dignity

Category : Christianity, Human Rights, Islam, Judaism

By: Khalid Baig
Posted: 20 Safar 1431, 5 February 2010

We are witnessing today a clash between two opposing views of human worth. The first holds that human beings have an inherent dignity conferred on them by the Creator. The other insists that human beings have no more claim to dignity than other animals, from which they differ only in the number and sequencing of DNA molecules. From tiny bacteria to human beings all are creations of accidental processes; therefore none of them can claim special status over others.

We cannot ignore it as a debate that is taking place in some obscure religion or philosophy class which should not interest the rest of us. Its vast implications affect every one of us wherever we happen to be: in our homes, businesses, schools, on the streets or at the airports. This is so because a society’s treatment of other humans depends upon its perception of the status and value of humanity itself.

If there is no inherent human dignity than there can be no inherent human rights. Then human rights are reduced to the level of a policy to be decided by the calculations of governments. If, on the other hand, we accept the first view then human rights become both serious and inalienable; they cannot be taken away in the name of this or that expediency.

The first view is expounded by the Qur’an which declares in no uncertain terms: “Now, indeed, We have conferred dignity on the children of Adam” (17:70). This is brought out through the Story of Creation. For God created man “with My two Hands” (38:75). Further, He breathed into Adam from His Spirit (15:29). This was so because Man was created as God’s vicegerent on earth (2:30).

Islam is not alone in asserting this dignity. All previous prophets had the same message. Thus both Judaism and Christianity affirmed it because man was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). This view was challenged by modern science. Resting on the twin pillars of Darwinism and Freudianism, its great “achievement” was in announcing that dignity and nobility of the human soul was a myth.

Darwin claimed that man was not specially created. Freud added that he had no free will that would distinguish him from animals. Rather man was subject to instinctive drives, unconscious impulses, and emotions over which he had no control.

It was not that science had discovered that the first view was baseless, since it had no capacity to affirm or reject claims about matters it could not observe. Rather it was that some of its proponents had developed a fanatical religious hatred against all religion because of their bad experience with some of it.

As it evolved under their patronage, modern science became a new faith that claimed to have made the faith in God and the moral values based on it obsolete. Of course, it could measure the speed of light, split the atom, and analyze the structure of DNA to “prove” its claims.

Those who have been mesmerized by the achievements of science have been torn between these opposing claims about human dignity. They claim that human beings have inalienable rights then proceed to forfeit those rights on one or the other pretext. They champion religious freedom then proceed to curb it. They affirm commitment to human dignity then proceed to defile it.

The new measures about universal nude body scans of all air travelers are just the latest manifestation of this conflict.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 12, states: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence…. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference.” Similarly the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

Yet we are told that we must bare ourselves for examination by officials if we want the privilege to travel. That the privacy protection does not even protect one’s private parts. The distance between the proclamations and the policies is the distance between the two views.

The noble declarations are rooted in the first view but the policies are in the second. That they may examine us just like they examine animals on a farm is to be expected if we are no better than animals.

Back to the Story of Creation that gives us special insights about this particular aspect. It tells us that the prestigious status given to mankind had its jealous enemy right from the start. It was the devil himself who came up with a plan to show that Man did not deserve the honor bestowed on him.

And so Satan’s very first attack was on the most important reflection of this dignity. It was launched with subterfuge and its purpose was to produce nudity. When under Satanic persuasion Adam and Eve tasted of the forbidden tree, “their shameful parts were manifested to them, and they began to piece together onto themselves some of the leaves of the Garden” (Qur’an 7:22). This narrative reminds us that the uncorrupted human nature abhors nudity.

That is why Adam and Eve frantically started to search for something to cover themselves at its first occurrence. This tendency distinguishes human beings from animals, for which nudity is natural.

Hence the reminder from God: “Children of Adam! Let not Satan tempt you as he brought your parents out of the Garden, stripping them of their garments to show them their shameful parts” (7:27). The immediately preceding ayah also tells us that clothing is a gift from God and concealing the parts of the body that must be concealed is its primary purpose, while protection from elements and adornment are secondary objectives.

In fact that function is integral to a central value in Islam: Haya. Although normally translated as modesty for lack of a better word, haya encompasses much more than that. It is modesty, decency, moral propriety, and inhibition against all evil, with special emphasis on concealing parts of the body. Haya is the antithesis to nudity.

As for its importance, Prophet Muhammad ( Sall-Allahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: “Every religion has a distinct call. For Islam it is haya.” [Ibn Majah]. Another famous hadith says: ” Haya is a branch of Iman (faith) ” [Bukhari, Muslim]. It is the basic building block of Islamic morality. When it is lost everything is lost.

The concept does exist in other religions as well. In Judaism the closest term is Tzniut, which represents both a moral value and specific laws that govern the dress code, and interaction between the sexes.

Rabbi Aron Moss of Australia explains: “The body is the holy creation of God. It is the sacred house of the soul. The way we maintain our respect for the body is by keeping it covered.” Tzniut requires covering of the body, segregation of men and women during prayers ( mechitzah), prohibition of shaking hands with a member of the opposite sex, and prohibition of being alone in a secluded place with them. For the most part these are subsets of the commands given by Islam.

In Christianity the term used is modesty. One finds repeated references to Christian modesty in encyclicals and directives. One such directive instructs: “In general, clothes should hide the shape of the body rather than accentuate it. Only this kind of clothing can truly be called ‘decent’.” Pope Pius XII said in the 1950s: “Vice necessarily follows upon public nudity.”

Of course the pop culture, augmented by the tremendous firepower of Hollywood and other mass media—and intellectually supported by the new science in its (im)moral underpinnings—has been a constant challenger to haya and modesty. It is a familiar story. As the floodgates of immodesty were opened, the Jewish and Christian teachings were washed away from the lives of their followers to the lament of their religious leaders.

More than three decades ago Rabbi Zalman Posner noted: “The prevalent culture has little patience with one of these values, and the Hebrew word [ tzniut] is virtually unknown to the American Jew.”

And the French Catholic leader Dom Bernard Marechaux lamented in alarming tones: “The cancer of Liberalism attacks everyone and we must be careful not to be infected ourselves. … Women who go to church dress just the way women who do not go to church dress; … It is a confusion of license and worldliness. As a result … the Church is beginning to disappear in the world. Christianity is being lost.” Pope Benedict XV said, “One cannot sufficiently deplore the blindness of so many women of every age and station …[who] do not see to what degree the indecency of their clothing shocks every honest man and offends God.”

They condemned the summer attire, the swimming suits, and every form of nudity in a loosing battle. Church leaders instructed the women to have their skirts at least eight inches below the knee when fashion designers persuaded them to go eight inches above. And everyone knows which direction they went.

The scene began to change with the arrival of Muslims. Muslims could recognize the nudity in the Western societies as the same abomination that had prevailed in the pre-Islamic Jahiliyya society of Arabia.

They remembered that haya is part of faith and the mother of all virtues. Against all odds and pressures they upheld the banner of haya. They became the shining example of modesty in a society that had forgotten it.

In this background comes the most vicious attack ever on human dignity in the form of the new nude body scanners being installed at airports. They can take pictures of the nude body from head to toe and from all around. They are being forced on every one—men, women, and children. If they go unopposed it will be a major triumph of the idea that human beings are mere animals as Darwin and Freud would have us believe.

But haya is the call of the uncorrupted human nature, a universal value that should bring together all the people of conscience who value morality and decency. While some governments have rushed to introduce these machines, others have raised strong objections.

Representing them, the new European Justice Commissioner, Viviane Reding, said, “we will not let anyone dictate to us rules that go against fundamental rights on anti-terrorism grounds . . . our need for security cannot justify any violation of privacy. We should never be driven by fear, but by values” (11 Jan. 2010, testimony before the European Union Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Legal affairs and Women’s committees).

Which values? That will be determined by the ongoing clash between the two views of human dignity. And the picture here is less than clear.

From>> http://albalagh.net/food_for_thought/0095.shtml

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

CrossTalk On Holocaust: Murder Revenues

Category : Gaza, Israel, Judaism, War on Terror, Zionism

Sixty-five years ago, Auschwitz was liberated by Soviet troops.

Peter Lavelle asks his guests what the legacy of the Holocaust is today.

Is its memory being abused?

Does Israel use Holocaust as a blackmail weapon?

Norman Finkelstein and Israel W. Charny discuss the issue in a heated debate.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

More Examples Of Zionist Racism – What Non-Jews Are Up Against

Category : Israel, Judaism, Zionism

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”
–Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994

“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
– Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.

In 1923, radical Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky– spiritual father of not only of Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin but of Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane– wrote that the “sole way” for Jews to deal with Arabs in Palestine was through “total avoidance of all attempts to arrive at a settlement”-which Jabotinsky euphemistically termed the “iron wall” approach. Not coincidentally, a picture of Jabotinsky graces Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s desk. Source: The Village Voice, “Death Wish in the Holy Land,” Dec. 12, 2001

During a sermon preceding the 2001 Passover holiday, the influential Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Yosef exclaimed: “May the Holy Name visit retribution on the Arab heads, and cause their seed to be lost, and annihilate them.” He added: “It is forbidden to have pity on them. We must give them missiles with relish, annihilate them. Evil ones, damnable ones.” Source: Ha’aretz April 12, 2001

“We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel…Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.”-Rafael Eitan, chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, quoted in Yediot Ahronot, April 13, 1983, and The New York Times, April 14, 1983.

“[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs.”-Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the ‘Beasts,”‘ New Statesman, June 25,1982.
“We must do everything to ensure they [the Palestinian refugees] never do return.”-David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, July 18, 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s “Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet,” Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.

“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.”-Israel Koenig, “The Koenig Memorandum.”
“We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters.”-Uri Lubrani, Israeli Prime Minister Ben-Gurion’s special adviser on Arab Affairs. Source: “The Arabs in Israel” by Sabri Jiryas.

“…the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish…with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary.”-Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency’s Colonization Department. From “Israel: an Apartheid State” by Uri Davis, p. 5.

“Everybody has to move, run and grab as many (Palestinian) hilltops as they can to enlarge the (Jewish) settlements because everything we take now will stay ours…Everything we don’t grab will go to them.”-Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of the Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, Nov. 15, 1998.

“Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment… Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.”-Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine, “Complete Diaries,” June 12, 1895 entry.

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, head of the Kever Yossev Yeshiva (school of Talmud) in Nablus stated, “The blood of the Jewish people is loved by the Lord; it is therefore redder and their life is preferable.”

The four – Michael Ben-Chorin, Netanel Uzari, Yoel Lerner, and Yosef Dayan – issued the book in honor of Goldstein who slaughtered 40 Palestinian men and boys while they knelt in prayer in the Ibrahimi Mosque at Hebron’s Machpela Cave, on Purim 1994. (Purim is the Jewish commemoration of vengeance against non-Jews).

The book, Baruch Hagever (“The Blessed Man”), has sold thousands of copies among Jews, and includes an article written by Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, the head of an Israeli yeshiva (religious school). Ginsburg’s article “sings the praises” of the killer and calls Goldstein, a ’saint.’ “The entire book is indeed full of his praises. It should be noted that no Israeli rabbi (including the ‘moderates’ among them) has said a word against the contents of the book.”

Ginsburg declares in Baruch Hagever that what Goldstein did in murdering the unarmed Palestinian civilians at their house of worship, constitutes, “a fulfillment of a number of commands of Jewish religious law…Among his (Goldstein’s) good deeds, as enumerated, are…taking revenge on non-Jews, extermination of the non-Jews who are from the seed of Amalek…and the sanctification of the Holy Name.

“The murders have led, in the rabbi’s opinion, to…clear knowledge among the Jews that ‘the life of a Jew is preferable to the life of a non-Jew’…

“Goldstein is indeed being worshipped as a saint in (the Jewish settlement ) Kiryat Arba. His intercession before God is asked by pilgrims and it is reported that he cures the ill and generally helps those Jews who ask his help.”

The Israeli Chief Rabbi of the Sephardim, Eliahu Bakshi Doron, in a radio broadcast on Tuesday, July 9, 1996, praised the Biblical figure Phinehas for having killed the Israelite Zimri, because Zimri had sex with a Midianite woman. Rabbi Doron said that Phinehas had committed a “pure” act. He then referred to Zimri as “the first reform Jew.”

Yediot Aharonot reports that Lederman had only served two years of his murder sentence when then Israeli Chief of Staff Rafael Eitan, who once compared Palestinians to “cockroaches scurrying in a bottle,” pardoned and released him. Two years later, Lederman snatched a baby out of the arms of a Palestinian mother .

In his own defense, Rabbi Hecht stated, “All I said was that according to Jewish law, any one person–you can apply it to whoever you want–any one person who willfully, consciously, intentionally hands over human bodies or human property or the human wealth of the Jewish people to an alien people is guilty of the sin for which the penalty is death.

“And, according to Maimonides–you can quote me–it says very clearly, if a man kills him, he has done a good deed.”

BEITUNYA, West Bank –Israeli motorists sprayed a group of Palestinian high school students with bullets from American-issued assault weapons on Thursday, Sept. 17, killing one youth and wounding another, witnesses and doctors said.

The eyewitnesses said the motorists shot without provocation. The shooting occurred around noon in the West Bank village of Beitunia.

Witnesses said about 10 high school students were walking along the main road on their way home from school when a vehicle with Israeli license plates pulled up near them.

The passengers rolled down their windows and began firing from a pistol and an assault rifle, said Raed Abdel Rahman, 17, one of the students who escaped injury. “Everybody started to jump and take cover,” said Rahman.

A high school student who was also on the scene, Hassan al-Qadi, told reporters, “They were shooting randomly.”

The wounded were taken to nearby Ramallah Hospital. Iyad Rahwa Qarabsi, 17, a high school senior described as an outstanding student, was shot in the stomach. He died at the hospital about an hour later, according to Ramallah hospital director Shauke Harb.

A doctor described the cause of death as bullet wounds from an M-16, an American-made, military assault rifle that Israeli settlers and soldiers carry.

15 year-old Mahmoud Issa Jabarin was in stable condition; also with a stomach wound, hospital officials said.

At the family home, Qarabsi’s mother collapsed on the floor and wept over the murder of her teenage son. “My beloved, you didn’t come home with your schoolbooks today!” she sobbed.

Ibrahim Murar, the principal of Beitunya’s 700-student Palestinian high school said, “”He was one of the very best students in the school. School was more important to him than anything else.”

After being held in custody for three days, the Jewish gunman, Avshalom Ladani, 35, a member of the West Bank settlement of Dolev, was released by Israeli authorities. Ladani immediately joined a party at a Jerusalem hotel where he was feted as a hero.

“We call on all [Jewish] residents to view Avshalom’s behavior as upstanding citizenship,” declared an advertisement placed in Israeli newspapers by the Yesha Council, a settlers’ group. The ad said the Jewish killer was being “persecuted.”

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu refused to condemn the shootings of the Palestinian students. According to the Sept. 21 Washington Post, “His aides pleaded extenuating circumstances…” They said the killer had been “provoked.”

Israeli officials said the shooting was not an act of Jewish terrorism; they termed the settler’s action merely “carelessness,” and “violence that was disproportionate.”

“This sounds to me like it was really an act of self-defense, if perhaps a careless one,” said David Bar-Illan, an adviser to Netanyahu.

A second Israeli gunman remains at large.

This is the second shooting within two days in which Israelis killed or wounded Palestinian youths. On Tuesday, Sept. 15, a Jewish settler shot and wounded 16-year-old Mohammed Musa Dweik in the Palestinian village of Zatara.

In America, one of the most zealous supporters of the gun-toting Israeli settlers and their right to automatic weapons banned in the U.S., is Brooklyn Congressman Charles E. Schumer.
Schumer helped promote and pass the the Federal government’s assault weapons ban, which outlawed the sale to the American people of 19 types of semiautomatic weapons, many of which are possessed by Israeli settlers. Schumer has stated, “I have made it (gun control) one of my life’s works…”

Except in Israeli-occupied Palestine.

Reporters Beaten Outside Courthouse By Jewish Vigilantes
Feb 28, 1998

Paris, France, – Two Arab reporters have complained to the French foreign ministry that they were attacked by Zionist terrorists at the trial of French writer Roger Garaudy, a ministry spokesman said on Saturday.

Abdallah Hassan, who works for the Egyptian news agency MENA, and Sayyed Hamdi, working for Saudi television, said they were beaten on Friday by two assailants near the Paris law courts.

They said the attack occurred shortly after Garaudy, 84, was fined 120,000 francs ($20,000) for questioning stories of homicidal gas chambers in his book “The Founding Myths of Israeli Politics.”
An Iranian reporter said he and his cameraman were also set upon by a crowd of Jewish youths following the verdict, although the foreign ministry said it had not yet received a complaint about this attack.

Foreign ministry spokesman Yves Doutriaux said he “regretted” the incidents and wished the injured reporters “a swift recovery.” He added that police were carrying out an investigation.
French television reported that a militant Jewish youth organisation, Betar-Tagar, had released a statement indicating that it had taken part in the violence.

“…the deniers were punished,” it quoted the statement as saying. Zionists refer to those who question the details of World War II Jewish accounts, as “deniers.”

Garaudy, a convert to Islam who has become a hero for many Arab intellectuals, argued in his book that Hitler’s persecution of Jews had been greatly exaggerated.

He also wrote that “the myth of the extermination of six million Jews” had become a dogma justifying Israel’s repression of Palestinians, and he alleged that western media were 95 percent controlled by Zionists.

“We were reporting the sentencing of Garaudy yesterday when we were attacked by a pro-Zionist group,” the Iranian reporter told French television. “A group of about 10 to 15 youths attacked me and the cameraman. They tried to prevent us reporting the trial by pulling down the microphone and camera,” he added.

Chief Rabbi Urged Israeli Army To Destroy Mosque

January 2, 1998

Last December, when two Jewish terrorists were arrested for allegedly plotting to throw a pig’s head onto the Temple Mount – an act of provocation intended to coincide with Ramadan prayers at the al-Aksa and Omar mosques there – Yasser Arafat noted that, “many times, we have warned of the attempts of Israeli extremists to defile al-Aksa and destroy it”.

Indeed, over the years, several Jewish radicals have been jailed for planning to blow up the mosques, as a prelude to the rebuilding of a Jewish Temple of Herod on the site.
Now evidence has emerged of a more mainstream call for their destruction – a call issued by the chief rabbi of the Israeli army, Rabbi Shlomo Goren, just hours after Israel captured the Old City during the Six-Day War of 1967.

According to information that has come to light this week, the late Rabbi Goren, urged Uzi Narkiss, the commander of the Israeli troops in the Old City, to “put 100 kilograms of explosives into the mosque, so that we may rid ourselves of it once and for all”. The mosque is the holiest shrine in Islam, after Mecca and Medina.

Major General Narkiss, who died last month, discussed the conversation in an interview conducted a year ago, but insisted it not be published while he was alive. He recalled that he firmly rejected Rabbi Goren’s suggestion, but that the rabbi was persistent: “Uzi, you’ll go down in history if you do this,” Rabbi Goren told him, “You don’t realize what tremendous significance this would have.

Zionist Quotes

From Eve <http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/news/?author=Eve&comments=yes>
May 14, 2002

“The greatest crime since World War II has been U.S. foreign policy.”
– Ramsey Clark
Former U.S. Attorney General under President Lyndon Johnson

“Foreign Minister Shimon Peres is very worried about the expected international reaction as soon as the world learns the details of the tough battle in the Jenin refugee camp.” It added that Israeli Defense Force (IDF) officers have similar worries: “The bulldozers are simply ’shaving’ the homes and causing terrible destruction. When the world sees the pictures of what we have done there, it will do us immense damage.”

April 9th, the Israeli daily Ha’aretz

“Every time we do something you tell me America will do
this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very
clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.
We, the Jewish people, control America, and the
Americans know it.”

– Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001,
to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.

Ben-Gurion stated in 1937, during the Arab revolt:

“This is a national war declared upon us by the Arabs. … This is an active resistance by the Palestinians to what they regard as a usurpation of their homeland by the Jews. …But the fighting is only one aspect of the conflict, which is in its essence a political one. And politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves.”

“The Israelis are becoming increasingly like the white supremacist South Africans, viewing the Palestinians as a lower form of life, not hesitating to kill a great many of them.”

“You cannot define the loss of human life in terms of the number of Israelis killed by brutal, savage, inexcusable Palestinian terror. And it does take place. The fact of the matter is that three times as many Palestinians have been killed, and a relatively small number of them were really militants. Most were civilians. Some hundreds of children.” –Zbigniew Brzezinski

“A partial Jewish State is not the end, but only the beginning. I am certain that we can not be prevented from settling in the other parts of the country and the region.” –David Ben Gurion, in a letter to his son, 1937

“Between ourselves it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country.”

“There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to neighboring countries – all of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left.” –Joseph Weitz, the head of the Jewish Agencys Colonization Department, which was responsible for the actual organization of settlements in Palestine, 1940

“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” –The Koenig Report

“We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.” –Heilbrun, the Chairman of the committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv

“The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt to the Euphrates. It includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.” –Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry, 1947
<http://www.iap.org/zionism2.htm>http://www.iap.org/zionism2.htm

“I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile.” –Romans 1:16 NIV

“Destroy all of the land ; beat down their pillars and break their statues
and waste all of their high places, cleaning the land and dwelling in it, for I
have given in to you a possession.” –Old Testament : Numbers: 33:52-53

“Before (the Palestinians) very eyes we are possessing the land and the villages where they and their ancestors have lived We are the generation of colonizers and without the steel helmet and the gun barrel we cannot plant a tree and build a house.” –Moshe Dayan

“There is no such thing as a Palestinian people… It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn’t exist.” –Golda Meir, in a statement to The Sunday Times, 15 June 1969.

“I have learned that the state of Israel cannot be ruled in our generation without deceit and adventurism.” –Moshe Sharett, Israel’s first Foreign Minister and later a Prime Minister (p.51 Simha Flapan, “The Birth of Israel”, 1987)

From The Bible:

“For you are a people holy to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for his own possession, out of all the peoples that are on the face of the earth.” –Deuteronomy 7:6

“When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and shall serve you. But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when the LORD your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourseves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the LORD your God has given you. Thus you shall do to all the cities which are very far from you, which are not cities of the nations here. But in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save nothing that breathes . . .” –Deuteronomy 20:10-16

“And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, nor shall its sovereignty be left to another people. It shall break into pieces all these kingdoms and bring them to an end, and it shall stand for ever . . .” –Daniel 2:44

(The Israelites) warred against Midian, as the LORD commanded Moses, and slew every male. . . . And the people of Israel took captive the women of Midian and their little ones; and they took as booty all their cattle, their flocks, and all their goods. All their cities in the places where they dwelt, and all their encampments, they burned with fire, and took all the spoil and all the booty, both of man and of beast . . . Moses said to them, “Have you let all the women live? . . . Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.” –Numbers 31:7-18

“He [the Jew] should not press his fellow [Jew] for payment . . . the foreigner [Gentile] you may press for payment.” –Deuteronomy 15: 2-3

“You must not make your brother pay interest, interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything on which one may claim interest. You may make a foreigner [Gentile] pay interest but your brother [fellow Jew] you must not make pay interest.” –Deuteronomy 23: 19-20

“Foreigners (Gentiles) shall rebuild your walls, and their kings shall minister to you . . . Your gates shall be open continuously; day and night they shall not be shut; that men may bring to you the wealth of the nations, with their kings led in procession. For the nation or kingdom that will not not serve you; shall perish; those nations shall be utterly laid waste. . . .” Isaiah 60:10-12

“You shall suck the milk of nations, you shall suck the breast of kings; and you shall know that I, the LORD, am your Savior and your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.” –Isaiah 60:16

“And strangers [Gentiles] shall stand and feed your flocks, strangers shall be your plowmen and vinedressers; but you shall be called the priests of the LORD, men shall speak of you as the ministers of our God; you shall eat the wealth of the nations, and in their riches you shall glory.” –Isaiah 61:5-6

From The Talmud:

“The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. Jehovah himself asks the opinions of earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven.”
–Rabbi Menachen, Comments for the Fifth Book

“Jehovah himself in heaven studies the Talmud, standing: he has such respect for that book.”
–Tractate Mechilla/Me’ilah

“The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. Jehovah himself asks the opinions of earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven.”
–Rabbi Menachen, Comments for the Fifth Book

“To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.”
–Libbre David 37

“A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.”
–Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17

“We beg Thee, O Lord, indict Thy wrath on the nations not believing in Thee, and not calling on Thy name. Let down Thy wrath on them and inflict them with Thy wrath. Drive them away in Thy wrath and crush them into pieces. Take away, O Lord, all bone from them. In a moment indict all disbelievers. Destroy in a moment all foes of Thy nation. Draw out with the root, disperse and ruin unworthy nations. Destroy them! Destroy them immediately, in this very moment!”
–Prayer said on the eve of Passover (Pranajtis: Christianus in Talmudae Judeorum, quotations from: Synagoga Judaica)

“The Feast of Tabernacles is the period when Israel triumphs over the other people of the world. That is why during this feast we seize the loulab and carry it as a trophy to show that we have conquered all other peoples, known as “populace”…”
–Zohar, Toldoth Noah 63b

“When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.”
–Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D

“On the house of the Goy [Goy means unclean, and is the disparaging term for a non-Jew] one looks as on the fold of cattle.”
–Tosefta, Tractate Erubin VIII

“When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it.”
–Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156

“If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth.”
–Choschen Hamm 388, 15

“The estates of the Goys are like wilderness, who first settles in them has a right to them.”
–Baba Bathra, 14?b

“Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: “Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh; they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath.” At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: “The Lord alone will appear great on that day! . . .”
–Zohar, Vayshlah 177b

“That the Jewish nation is the only nation selected by God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and hateful.
That all property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general.
A Jew may rob a Goy, he may cheat him over a bill, which should not be perceived by him, otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured.”
–Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat, 348

R. Hanina said: “If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death; for it is written, And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian. [Ex. 2:12] R. Hanina also said: He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, one who smiteth man [i.e. an Israelite] attacketh the Holy One.”
–Sanhedrin 58b

“Kill the Goyim by any means possible.”
–Choshen Ha’mishpat 425:50

“Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious [non-Jews] is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God.”
–Yalkut 245c

“Extermination of the Christians is a necessary sacrifice.”
–Zohar, Shemoth

“Tob shebbe goyyim harog – Even the best of the Goyim (Gentiles) should be killed.”
–Soferim 15, Rule 10

“ONE SHOULD NOT PLACE CATTLE IN HEATHENS’ INNS, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF IMMORAL PRACTICE WITH THEM. A WOMAN SHOULD NOT BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF LEWDNESS, NOR SHOULD A MAN BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF SHEDDING BLOOD. . .

“Why then should we not leave female animals alone with female heathens? – Said Mar ‘Ukba b. Hama: Because heathens frequent their neighbours’ wives, and should one by chance not find her in, and find the cattle there, he might use it immorally. You may also say that even if he should find her in he might use the animal, as a Master has said: Heathens prefer the cattle of Israelites to their own wives, for R. Johanan said: When the serpent came unto Eve he infused filthy lust into her.”
–Avodah Zarah 22a-b

“All Israelites will have a part in the future world . . . The Goyim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to hell.”
–Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah, Lekh-Lekha

Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.
Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L

“Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings.’
–Schulchan Oruch, Orach Chaiw 14, 20, 32, 33, 39. TaIDud Jebamoth 61

“A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.”
Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348

“A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.”
Gad. Shas. 2:2

“A boy-goy after nine years and one day old, and a girl after three years and one day old, are considered filthy.”
–Pereferkowicz, Talmud t.v., p. 11

“[The daughters of the heathens] should be considered as in the state of niddah [filth] from their cradle . . .”
–Avodah Zarah 36b

“They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it should cause defilement by seminal emission so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with him. . . . It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl [communicates defilement] from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux. This is obvious!”
–Avodah Zarah 36b-37a

R. Joseph said: “Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition [intercourse], and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah] she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with gonorrhoea].”
–Sanhedrin 55b

Rab said: “Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.24 (24) I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.”
–Sanhedrin 54b

Raba said. “It means this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [three years old], it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as ‘a girl who is injured by a piece of wood.’ . . .”
–Kethuboth 11b

“Do not save Goyim in danger of death.
Show no mercy to the Goyim.”
–Hilkkoth Akum X1

“A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean.”
–Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122

“And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, ‘Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null.1 [HIS VOWS ARE THEN INVALID,] PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW.”
–Nedarim 23b

“The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud…”
“Babylonian Talmud”, published by the Boston Talmud Society, p. XII

“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”
–Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b

“The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew.”
–Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30

“Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore he will be served by animals in human form.”
–Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855

“A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal.”
–Coschen hamischpat 405

“The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs.”
Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b

“Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.”
–Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b

“If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog.”
–Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b

“If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: “God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his oxen or asses had died”.”
–Jore dea 377, 1

“Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals.”
–Talmud Sanhedrin 74b

“It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile.”
–Sepher ikkarim III c 25

“It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.”
–Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5

“A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.”
–Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b

“Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.”
–Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772

From >> http://www.rense.com/general42/morej.htm

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace